Apparently big gay cocks are are much more interesting to study than big straight cocks, or why not just all big cocks in general. A study that has been done is about the bigger the gay man’s penis is, the more likely that person is to have unprotected sex.

Several questions rise in my head. What is the use of this survey? Are one to go out and warn men with huge cocks that they are at risk of having unprotected sex tonight? And how did they even raise funds to do the study with like “we think that gay men with big sticks are having unprotected sex due to…?” And yes, I know that the study also is about the free condoms that is handed out at bars and clubs all are one-size, but in that case you just have to ask your self: are hung gay men cheaper? The possibility to buy a condom still exists even for gay men. Could it be that gay men with big guns are more stupid (possibly from having all blood in one place in your body) and therefor have other socioeconomic disadvantages to buy condoms than others? Hum.. all this research and so little time! Though: the question remains: why is the big straight cock uninteresting?

Read the study here. Scientists have of course also done research on wether the size has any correlation to one being top/bottom/versatile. At this I can’t stop laughing. The answer is of course: the man with the big thing is king, you are a top if you have a huge schlong, and bottom is you have a small one. If you are normal or average you are versatile. Come on! Patriarchy has spoken once again! You all understand what kind of storm it would be in the media if the study was on “the bigger boobs, the more likely the person is to have unprotected sex”.